How Do You Know if You Have a Case for Medical Malpractice?

Yous know about how individuals gain control of the power of the Land and so abuse that ability similar former U.s.a. President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a state of war in Republic of iraq which was highly profitable for some US businesses.  He accomplished this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons program which was a serious world security threat when Republic of iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the state of war his Dad George Bush-league Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'off-white game' for Bush United kingdom The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley xv Feb 2011.

Retrieve how Bush was supported past UK Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the United states of america with faked "intelligence" of Iraq'south weapons of mass destruction which did not exist but which Blair claimed could be deployed inside 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If y'all remember that and then y'all will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Discover how they persuade us nosotros are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can salve us all if we trust them?

This trickery is non new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously near how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that bluntly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the affliction came almost as a upshot of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living atmospheric condition, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The issue cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – whatsoever vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Modest Pox – Large Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease chosen smallpox and it did impale people long ago.

This was specially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London'southward showtime park congenital after rich feared disease spread from slums UK The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 Nov 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The heart and upper classes needed to exist reassured the State would keep them safe from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could attain this by ensuring the so truly "slap-up unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth only the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did non piece of work and sometimes killed as many or more the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, Great britain, USA, Sweden.

At present yous can read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Bloodshed- U.k., U.s.a. & SWEDEN

In the graphs below discover the big numbers of deaths acquired by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells usa. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On whatsoever scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the reject in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the Metropolis of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the residue of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [encounter tabular array below].  Leicester's approach as well cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" Past J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Unabridged Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Period.	Small-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-charge per unit per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.eight
British Ground forces (Britain)	1860-1908	one,355	96	7.1
British Regular army (Bharat)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.ane
British Regular army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.eight
Royal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	8.0
Thousand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.iii
Leicester (since giving upwardly vaccination)	1880-1908	i,206	61	five.1

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist linguistic communication, may I enquire, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Regular army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding outcome—simply on the opposite side."

TABLE 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Toll, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-charge per unit Per Cent	Price of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	16.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	iii,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£ii,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– August 27, 2013

With the budgeted flu season and the enthusiastic calls to use the influenza vaccine, you might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the thought of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books present a unproblematic tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the same basic tale of the brilliant observation of a simple state dr. and his courage in attempting to thwart a mortiferous and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as information technology was frequently called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular volume, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year old boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps'due south hands. The boy came down with a slight fever, merely naught more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-diddled, admitting mild, instance of the disease. Nil happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox again; again, nix. [1]

Edward Jenner's thought somewhen became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin give-and-take for moo-cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, just somewhen the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the globe would exist freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is non unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the mortiferous snake-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a unproblematic and memorable story of a hero defeating the mortiferous enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in identify, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to support a conventionalities, attain an iconic condition while any unsavory aspects almost the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. Information technology begins with the concept of using pocket-sized amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western world past Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the exercise of inoculation confronting smallpox, known as variolation. This blazon of inoculation was simply a affair of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better against the disease than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and place in the futurity.

The thought was embraced past the medical profession and enthusiastically adept. Only because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could only be afforded by the wealthy.[three] The process did often help protect the private that was inoculated, but there was nevertheless an estimated ii-5% that died as a issue.[iv,five] All the same, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] Just, was the deviation in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could it have had something to practice with the fact that the wealthy had ameliorate access to more than nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of society?

There was one major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than in that location would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years later, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse issues, because information technology acquired more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably similar the plague a contagious affliction, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the exercise of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced past Inoculation where it would not otherwise take been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural manner; these centers of contagion are manifestly multiplied very profoundly by Inoculation . . .[7]

Withal, while the popularity of variolation varied, the trouble of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had become a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued by most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. Information technology was rumored amid milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect ane from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-year-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with information technology. He subsequently deliberately exposed the child to smallpox every bit a test to see if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, it was causeless that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection confronting smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

Merely he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The moo-cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed moo-cow-pox . . . [8]

From the beginning there were problems with Jenner's procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were and then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to encounter if the cowpox procedure had been constructive. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report but decided to ignore the results because they were non in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was rapidly embraced past many in the medical profession as the answer to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the process would produce lifelong protection. The medical customs continued to embrace Jenner'southward ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the year 1799. A calendar month afterwards it was inoculated with modest-pox matter without effect, and a few months afterwards took confluent small-pox and died. 2. A woman-servant to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had moo-cow-pox in the coincidental way from milking. 7 years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught small-scale-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, 3 years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summertime of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'due south office . . . died of small-pox a year after vaccination.[x]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox afterward vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[xi] Notation that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an eighteen% fatality charge per unit and is essentially the same fatality charge per unit as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering nether Small Pox, who take previously undergone Vaccination by the nearly skillful practitioners, is at present alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of feel in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no i in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." Simply after vaccinating i,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, later vaccination, people still could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the do.[thirteen]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace it as a new class of income. It is therefore quite significant for a md to have spoken out against it as Dr. Chocolate-brown did.

Connected observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could too be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, ane, and, two [1820-1822] there was a great hubbub almost the small-pox. It broke out with the great epidemic to the north . . . Information technology pressed shut to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-pox before, and frequently severely; nearly to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, only fell upon smashing numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, announcer, and English language pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons moo-cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, take taken the real pocket-size-pox afterwards, and accept either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but every bit failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and there were calls to obtain fresh textile directly from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine fabric came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, in that location were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was but smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new illness.[eighteen] This faulty belief would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow's udder. He then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A big smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[xix] A later inquiry determined that this was nothing more than the quondam practise of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but at that place were also reports of deaths from other causes presently after vaccination. For example, a pare condition chosen erysipelas was a specially prolonged and painful way to dice.

. . . a boy from Somers-boondocks, aged 5 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (nine days)." He had been vaccinated at the historic period of 4 months; 1 cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, anile 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (eight days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a sugar baker, aged 13 weeks, died of "full general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could exist spread causing diverse epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

Start I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more, and at present I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I practice this very reluctantly. At nowadays I exercise non hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to exist, refusals increased. In order to bargain with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did naught to adjourn the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. Afterward 1855, at that place were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These echo smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no upshot at all (Graph i). In fact, more than people died in the twenty years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox bloodshed charge per unit from 1841 to 1880.

By this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection confronting smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the bulk of the medical profession supported vaccination, at that place were those that spoke out confronting the process. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were existence made by vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the force of police created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western earth.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 lonely they amounted to £54,727, and in the nowadays yr they will get nearly a quarter one thousand thousand. Other sums, too, which I cannot proper name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced and so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental command strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did non vaccinate their children. Still, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French ground forces is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war in that location were twenty-three thousand four hundred and threescore-nine cases of small-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July fifteen, 1871 said:

Of nine grand three hundred and ninety-two pocket-size-pox patients in London hospitals, six thousand eight hundred and fifty-4 had been vaccinated. Seventeen and i-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than ane hundred and twenty-two m vaccinated persons have suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Germany prove that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal freedom and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backfire culminated in the great demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same year Leicester'southward government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail fourth dimension, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a inexpensive and effective means that eliminated the demand for vaccination. Even so, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would result in a terrible "massacre," particularly in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the boondocks's residents were steadfast in their conventionalities that vaccination was non necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would somewhen be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed every bit the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The feel of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a peachy manufacturing town having a population of nigh a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated past a crucial exam of an experience extending over a menstruum of more a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less afflicted past that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a time when ninety-v per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was oft promoted as a safety process, information technology frequently acquired sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more i,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox bloodshed rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the cease of the 1800s, smallpox changed its grapheme. After the summertime of 1897, the severe blazon of smallpox with its high decease charge per unit, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed ane in 5 of its victims to i that only killed anywhere from 1 in l and later to as low as 1 in 380. The disease could still impale, merely having go so much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later gradually spread over the country. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was unremarkably at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death rate was around 20%, as it had been historically. The tabular array also showed that after 1896 the death rate roughshod off rapidly, starting with six% in 1897 to as low every bit 0.26% by 1908. As the mild form of smallpox replaced the classic blazon, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a balmy affliction of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor communicable illness of babyhood, and is importantly important because it frequently gives rising to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced little in the mode of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection past vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent-minded, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Fifty-fifty though smallpox was non a major upshot, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the last smallpox death in the United states of america in 1948 upward until 1963. This resulted in an estimated five,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of ix children in which 2 died of a skin status due to vaccination, at present being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to be betwixt 1 in 20,000 to ane in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to forty%.[35] Even so, they best-selling that almost cases were non reported and there was no accurate bookkeeping on this consequence of vaccination. There were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the same fourth dimension there had just been 1 smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox death in the U.s.a. following an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time there take been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is withal occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected past his military father after the father was vaccinated. Subsequently a prolonged admission, and a calendar week of experimental treatments including allowed globulin from donor claret and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother too required treatment and virus was found all over the house.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 written report thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been fifty-fifty higher. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United states. If the deaths were this loftier in a state with a mod health-care system, what was the full number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the entire globe?

In that location were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the thought completely and perhaps afraid that if nosotros did the blow of some future epidemic might put us in the incorrect. We adopt to let compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to need an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this fourth dimension with vaccination equally near the only medically promoted style to bargain with disease, there were doctors finding astonishing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common nutrient product that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. M. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the apply of Acetic acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as practical to small-scale pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more than reliable as a safety in minor-pox than Belladonna in reddish fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed 2 table-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the condom treatment died, while among those under ordinary handling the mortality was as usual.[forty]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar equally a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple tree cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used iii or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need have no fearfulness of smallpox if he will accept ii or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or iv times a twenty-four hours." The discussion may now be regarded as airtight, and smallpox at concluding is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, simply just because most people accept been conditioned to accept the historic period-onetime prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, affliction-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected beast's (commonly a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the germination of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in pare, bones, and claret vessels and too gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is non able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls autonomously.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King'due south College, described the poor nutrition of gilded miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fatty, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, equally living virtually entirely upon fried salary or fat pork and flour fabricated into concoction-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of potent java, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men beingness at the same time subjected to the most intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Aureate Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of expiry listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly accounted for at least ii-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the adjacent common crusade of expiry, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a small fraction. Those who were killed in bodily boxing or who died as a result of their wounds accounted only for 1 percent of the total deaths.

Other large infectious killers such as scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known equally pertussis) all greatly declined during this fourth dimension to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive refuse of 99% of deaths in whooping coughing and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph five & 6).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough bloodshed charge per unit from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a state doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to exist echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. Just the true history shows united states of america a different reality.

The brand proper name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the earth psyche every bit something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the aforementioned notion of injecting whole or parts of disease affair into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific illness. The reality of vaccination is cypher shut to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and take since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's groovy discovery and the continued onslaught of unsafe vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the proper noun of supposedly healthier people. Now that the pall has been pulled dorsum on the origins of vaccination, do more and more than vaccines seem like a adept idea to you lot?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies tin be plant in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can be found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Scientific discipline the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
three.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Wellness, St. Louis, C.5. Mosby Visitor, 1922, p. 189.
four.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the Showtime Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Country of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
vi.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Admirer's Magazine and Historical Relate, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Confronting Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
ten.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What information technology Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Deed of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. VIII, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Nowadays Land of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Periodical, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
xiv."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Communication to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Immature Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in French republic," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Dr.-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Advice and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical periodical, vol. four, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, Doctor, "Fractional Study on the Product of Vaccine Virus in the Us," Transactions of the American Medical Clan, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morn Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Written report of Legislation Regarding Public Wellness in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. iv, February 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Modest-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, Apr 1911, vol. nineteen, no. four, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.One thousand. W. Harman, Dr., "A Physician's Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Periodical of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. i, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June one, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, Medico, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. W. Hodge, Doc, "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. Iii, no. sixteen, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Blazon of Infectious Illness every bit Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. xiii, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Visitor, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, Westward.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos Physician, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, Baronial 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acetic Acrid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Germ-free Science, vol. 1, no. ane, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. Six, no. ane, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King'south College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), Nov 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Wellness Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Harm, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, authorities, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, scientific discipline, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

andrewsprowhy.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Bagikan Artikel ini